consular immunity from arrest case laws for Dummies
consular immunity from arrest case laws for Dummies
Blog Article
refers to your landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Here’s a brief overview:
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which has not been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged prevalence plus the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred being the real brothers of the deceased but they didn't respond in the slightest degree towards the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is often a weak style of evidence which could be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light at the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on a motorcycle at four.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case has long been or will be filed.
long period petitioner wasn't viewed as for promotion, meeting of your departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Petitioner having been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular in addition to a half year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may well avoid standing trial and for this reason delay the prosecution of the case. The material on record makes the case of the petitioner falls under two exceptions towards the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.
This guide supplies important insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Online access towards the case management system for the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.
Though a lot of websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical to evaluate the credibility of your source before depending on the information.
How much sway case law holds may change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To take a look at this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Except case is tried(Bail Matters)
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a click here significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.